Don't touch me there?

[NicoleLJ]

The new scanners they are now using have raised questions because of the type of radiation they use, and the possible risk of not only high prevalence of skin cancer, but corneal cancer. There are other, safer technologies.

Run me through the metal detector, I'm okay with that. Do not subject me to extra radiation when you cannot tell me hat it will do to me 5 or ten years from now. Do not put my vision at risk unnecessarily - and it is unnecessary. Do not think you have license to touch me places I could sue anyone else for touching me.

There is no way I could handle the pat down. Being a rape victim I can;t handle strangers touching me. I will go into a huge panic attack. I don't like the idea of the scan either for similar reasons. Knowing a stranger is looking at my naked body agianst my will would also most likely send me into a panic, though probably not as sever as the pat down. So I would most likely choose the scan. Thank goodness I don't fly often.

But for Doug the radiation is the issue. He was born blind in one eye and has limited vision in the other. He can see with a strong contact lense. There is no way he would agree to the scanner and risk his one good eye.

[RICHARD]

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/articl...rches/19728594



Barack could have combined his Health Care plan with airline travel.


A colonoscopy with every airline ticket.

[Grace]

Those who are exempt -


Who is exempt from airport security?
By Ed O'Keefe

Increased scrutiny of airport security means public officials are being asked if they have or would be willing to endure airport security pat-downs.

"Not if I could avoid it. I mean, who would?" Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told CBS on Sunday. But Clinton, who travels on government aircraft with a large security detail, is a rare exception.

Here's a review of who can and cannot bypass airport security, according to the Transportation Security Administration and conversations with congressional and Obama administration aides:

Members of Congress: Congressional leaders who are assigned a security detail, including the speaker of the House, the House minority leader and the Senate majority leader, are allowed to pass through airport security checkpoints when flying commercial jets, according to the TSA. All other members of Congress are expected to stand in line and wait.

And lawmakers are no stranger to the potential embarrassments of airport security: Screeners ordered Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) to pull down his pants at Reagan National Airport in 2002 after a knee brace, surgically implanted pins in his ankles and a steel hip joint set off metal detectors. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) last year cursed at Salt Lake City airport security screeners and claimed he was unfairly targeted for voting against collective bargaining rights for transportation security officers.

Government officials: President Obama, Vice President Biden and Cabinet secretaries who travel on government aircraft or with security details (Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates) obviously don't pass through security checkpoints.

Former presidents flying commercial with Secret Service agents, Cabinet secretaries who use commercial aviation and travel with bodyguards and some foreign ambassadors also traveling with guards are exempt from screening, according to the TSA and congressional aides. Cabinet secretaries without protection and other senior government officials flying commercial must be screened.

Members of the military: Members of the military traveling in uniform must pass through security checkpoints but are not required to remove their footwear unless it sets off a metal detector, according to the TSA. The agency also allows airlines to issue special access passes to military family members who are not flying but want to say goodbye or greet a loved one at the gate.

Law enforcement officers: State, local and tribal police officers who must fly with a firearm have to obtain an identifier code from the TSA before flying. The officer must present the code and law enforcement credentials before passing through security.

[RICHARD]

[sparks19]

Don't you just feel safer already

I love this guy from mythbusters haha

http://consumerist.com/2010/11/adam-...ng-weapon.html

[Medusa]

After flying to L.A. and back this past week, I didn't have to go through a scanner or the pat down. It was all random. However, when I checked in, the airline personnel didn't ask to see my ID and she didn't even look at me once, not even a sideways glance.

[Marigold2]

There is no radiation. It is not an xray it'a a magnet

There is no way I could handle the pat down. Being a rape victim I can;t handle strangers touching me. I will go into a huge panic attack. I don't like the idea of the scan either for similar reasons. Knowing a stranger is looking at my naked body agianst my will would also most likely send me into a panic, though probably not as sever as the pat down. So I would most likely choose the scan. Thank goodness I don't fly often.

But for Doug the radiation is the issue. He was born blind in one eye and has limited vision in the other. He can see with a strong contact lense. There is no way he would agree to the scanner and risk his one good eye.

[Karen]

Tthe scanners are most certainly radiation, and depending on the model, ionizing radiation at that.