Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Must Be The Rarified Air They Breath

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kentucky, LAND OF THE EASILY AMUSED
    Posts
    25,224
    Quote Originally Posted by lizbud View Post
    I have been waiting for this decision. I knew it was on the courts calender.

    I am deeply disappointed in the decision to void the cruelty law. I wonder
    what planet these justices live on. They say it's ok to film acts of cruelty (which are illegal).



    http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/04/20/...ex.html?hpt=T2
    It's Sotomayor's doing, everyone knows that Latinos are huge fans of animal fighting.

    Morons.

  2. #2
    If they had decided differently I would have been rather irritated, to put it mildly.

    The decision was 8-1. Not even a close decision. The US Government CANNOT make laws censoring speech. If someone is doing a documentary on an unpopular subject, what's to prevent Congress from quickly making a law saying that that film is illegal?

    Free speech is a fundamental right. This and the McCain-Feingold decision somewhat restore my faith that the USSC is doing its job, regardless of how popular their decisions might be.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Richard, the vote was 8-1. I hardly think you could blame just one Justice.

    Alito was the hold-out. Good for him

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kentucky, LAND OF THE EASILY AMUSED
    Posts
    25,224
    Quote Originally Posted by Grace View Post
    Richard, the vote was 8-1. I hardly think you could blame just one Justice.

    Alito was the hold-out. Good for him
    I am being facetious.

    For pete's sake....They televise the Cubs games, isn't that torture?

    -----------------

    This bust took place up the street from me.

    1,500 animals!


    As much as it pains me to say this? Most cockfighting rings that are busted here in So Cal are run by Mexicans who just cannot seem to let this go.

    And if the truth is known?

    This fact is comparable to the known habits of people who fight dogs.....The idiots that run these 'gladiator' fights probably take better care of the animals than they do their own families.


    Not a badge of honor, nor anything to take pride in. It's one of those 'things' like the SCJ ruling on videos of animals, that are the distasteful part of life.

    IT like the AHs the protest at the funerals of soldiers. I would love to see what they would say after I parked my truck on top of them, but it is one of those "protected" rights that people have.


    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...in-sylmar.html

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Ploss's Halfway House for Homeless Cats
    Posts
    18,311
    Were the justices smoking crack when they made this absolutely ridiculous decision.

    Rest In Peace Casey (Bubba Dude) Your paw print will remain on my heart forever. 12/02
    Mollie Rose, you were there for me through good times and in bad, from the beginning.Your passing will leave a hole in my heart.We will be together "One Fine Day". 1994-2009
    MooShoo,you left me too soon.I wasn't ready.Know that you were my soulmate and have left me broken hearted.I loved you like no other. 1999 - 2010See you again "ONE FINE DAY"
    Maya Linn, my heart is broken. The day your beautiful blue eyes went blind was the worst day of my life.I only wish I could've done something.I'll miss your "premium" purr and our little "conversations". 1997-2013 See you again "ONE FINE DAY"

    DO NOT BUY WHILE SHELTER ANIMALS DIE!!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by moosmom View Post
    Were the justices smoking crack when they made this absolutely ridiculous decision.
    No, they were striking down a law which treads on a little thing called the Bill of Rights. (And they didn't even have to create a right or interpret what the founders meant to come to the decision!)
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Westchester Cty, NY
    Posts
    8,738
    I agree with LH. The ruling was that the law was "too broad". If censorship of any type is allowed, no matter how distasteful the message, it sets a dangerous precedent, IMO. This is why the KKK, al Qaeda, etc. websites are per se not taken down; however, they can be portals for law enforcement to go after those that do illegal deeds.
    I've been finally defrosted by cassiesmom!
    "Not my circus, not my monkeys!"-Polish proverb

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wyoming, USA
    Posts
    4,102
    I too agree with LH and STE. Freedom means freedom, you can't pick and choose. Once you start that, there is no end to it.

    They are not saying that cruelty is now legal. They are saying that documenting it is legal. If it were not, no one could make a documentary about dogfighting or illegal whaling, for example. No one could film the TV shows everyone loves about cops and criminals. That is, after all, filming illegal acts, some of them no doubt cruel. Obviously, this also allows scumbags to profit from their or their friends and relatives dog fighting. But, it might also be the way the ring is identified and busted.

    The point is, you can't allow some freedom of speech and press and not all.
    "We give dogs the time we can spare, the space we can spare and the love we can spare. And in return, dogs give us their all. It's the best deal man has ever made" - M. Facklam

    "We are raised to honor all the wrong explorers and discoverers - thieves planting flags, murderers carrying crosses. Let us at last praise the colonizers of dreams."- P.S. Beagle

    "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. From the ashes a fire shall be woken, A light from the shadows shall spring; Renewed shall be blade that was broken, The crownless again shall be king." - J.R.R. Tolkien

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by RICHARD View Post
    It's Sotomayor's doing, everyone knows that Latinos are huge fans of animal fighting.

    Morons.
    This made me LMAO! I knew RICHARD was being his usual tounge in cheek self but it was still dang funnay.

    Im not a big fan of the public good or the "greater good", if the .gov is for it.

    This isnt about yelling fire in a movie theater or yelling bomb on an airplane.
    [WHITEPOST]What if you're a bombardier? Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb bombardier[/WHITEPOST]
    If we start censoring free speech we arent much better then the.........
    Last edited by blue; 04-24-2010 at 01:29 AM. Reason: you're not your.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

Similar Threads

  1. Cat Breath :)
    By kilbarchancats in forum Cat General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-26-2005, 08:04 AM
  2. bad breath!
    By Pembroke_Corgi in forum Dog Health
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-11-2005, 08:42 PM
  3. Help! Bad Breath!
    By AngelZoo in forum Dog General
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-03-2005, 05:43 PM
  4. Bad breath...HELP!!!
    By Kristl in forum Dog General
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-05-2005, 08:55 PM
  5. pup with bad breath
    By evelyn1157 in forum Dog Health
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-31-2001, 06:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com