Michael Jackson Dead

**Grace** · 07-14-2009, 02:17 PM

The New York Post is reporting today that Debbie Rowe is once again selling her children - this time to Katherine Jackson. And for the paltry sum of $4 million.

I won't be surprised if this turns out to be correct, but I figured she's want more money than that figure.

**Medusa** · 07-14-2009, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by Grace

The New York Post is reporting today that Debbie Rowe is once again selling her children - this time to Katherine Jackson. And for the paltry sum of $4 million.

I won't be surprised if this turns out to be correct, but I figured she's want more money than that figure.

It's despicable but MJ was on the other end of the first business deal.

**RICHARD** · 07-14-2009, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Grace

The New York Post is reporting today that Debbie Rowe is once again selling her children - this time to Katherine Jackson. And for the paltry sum of $4 million.

That's a pretty good deal.

The six packs are way more expensive and harder to raise. Ask Jon and Kate?

------------------------------

And our esteemed mayor came out and told everyone that the city will pay for all the costs incurred by MJ's death.

I mean, if my mayor says it's O.K. than it must be O.K.?

**pomtzu** · 07-14-2009, 03:06 PM

I thought Debbie Rowe was going to fight for custody to make sure that Joe Jackson was out of their lives. I guess that $4 million will make her forget what Joe did to his own kids - especially MJ. If this story is true, then IMO, she's no better than he is.
Even if Katherine gets custody, you know JJ will do his utmost be exploit those kids - and who know what else.

**Grace** · 07-14-2009, 03:53 PM

News Flash -

Debbie Rowe's lawyer: No deal in Jackson case

By Alan Duke
CNN

LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- No deal has been reached between Michael Jackson's mother and his ex-wife over the custody of the late singer's children, according to a lawyer in the case.

Eric George, who represents Debbie Rowe, the biological mother of Jackson's two oldest children, demanded Tuesday that the New York Post retract its report that Rowe had agreed to take $4 million not to challenge Katherine Jackson for custody.

In a letter sent Tuesday afternoon to the newspaper's editor, George said the report "can only have been concocted with reckless disregard for the truth."

"There has been no agreement reached between Ms. Rowe and the Jacksons," George said.

While George said Rowe still has not decided if she will ask the court for custody or visitation, he said she will not try to get money from the Jackson family.

"Ms. Rowe has not accepted -- and will not accept -- any additional financial consideration beyond the spousal support she and Michael Jackson personally agreed to several years ago," George said.

The couple divorced in 1999 with Rowe giving Jackson full custody while she got a $8.5 million settlement, according to court documents. Jackson later agreed to additional support.

Jackson's lawyer has not responded to requests for comment Tuesday.

The Jackson family lawyer said last week that they were working to "privately and amicably resolve" the matter.

A child custody court hearing, which had been set for this week, was delayed until next Monday at the request of lawyers for Jackson and Rowe, a court official said.

**Medusa** · 07-14-2009, 04:01 PM

Spousal support. Interesting way of saying "child sale".

**pomtzu** · 07-16-2009, 01:04 PM

I guess I should have expected to see this....

I was shopping in Sam's today and was looking thru the books. Lo and behold - guess what was there??? - a whole table of MJ commemorative books - at least 8 different ones. And these weren't old publications - all new and dealing with the current MJ state of affairs. And they weren't magazines - most were hard cover books.

The presses must have been rolling before he was even cold.

Anything for a buck, I guess.

**carole** · 07-16-2009, 07:18 PM

Our newspapers are still full of things about MJ, and all the magazines, some are saying he was gay now, and even this guy saying he had been with MJ,so much controversy still going on as to whether the children are really his at all, and they think that the mother of the youngest will come forward and claim her child now, it will go on and on, it is the children i really feel for here.