A Firearm in Every Home.

[Whisk_Luva]

Reading between the lines leads to problems and writing between the lines leads to more problems but includes plausable deniability.

The emo question? Take another look at the definition for Paranoid Schizophrenia and look into the emo lifestyle, they're pretty similar.

You asked alot of rhetorical questions in your posts, so if you put all my unanswerred questions in one post I will address them.

When it means watching your family starve because someone with a machete took all of your supplies, yes I do.

I feel the term issue is very fitting, I did not mean it as an insult in anyway.

Well I look for the hidden meanings in things and I don't see the issue with it. Obvously, I don't intend to write leaving things hidden unless it is a poem or something, so obvously in this kind of topic I wouldn't. In this thread I am just trying to get the full meanings behind what is said.

Ok, I am kind of lost with the whole emo thing, but oh well.

If you watch someone starve because of a use of a weapon, I do not think they would want to use one themselves.

Anyway, the direct question I meant were:

You could of just used the word differences. That is not as insulting. The word 'issue' is implying paranioia anyway. So, are you implying that all all cultures where people are threatened by guns are inferior?
Also if you are saying everyone should carry a gun for defense and so on, doesn't that mean if every carried a nuclear weapon everyone else should? Can you imagine the problems that would cause? Where do you draw the line? Because going by one of your main arguements, that situation would be ok.

[Puckstop31]

I think Blue just doesn't do nuance.

You? Think? LOL

I'm still waiting for for your defence of your mans economic policies. You belive in him. Tell me why Keynesian economics will work... You talk down to me about "facts". I am more than ready for this debate. I look forward to any responce you might have.

[Grace]

You? Think? LOL

I'm still waiting for for your defence of your mans economic policies. You belive in him. Tell me why Keynesian economics will work... You talk down to me about "facts". I am more than ready for this debate. I look forward to any responce you might have.

Why do you keep 'calling out' posters ? You've done it to me, as well as lizbud. I'm sure she doesn't like it any better than I did.

The original topic of this post is firearms. Start a new topic about economics if that is what you are interested in.

[Puckstop31]

Why do you keep 'calling out' posters ? You've done it to me, as well as lizbud. I'm sure she doesn't like it any better than I did.

The original topic of this post is firearms. Start a new topic about economics if that is what you are interested in.

Just trying to confirm what I suspect. And if I DID start another thread, would you try to provide an answer?

[Grace]

Just trying to confirm what I suspect. And if I DID start another thread, would you try to provide an answer?

Only if it interested me, and only if I felt comfortable with my knowledge of the topic. I did respond to your topic on the Constitution - remember?

In the meantime, why don't you stop playing these silly games.

[lizbud]

Why do you keep 'calling out' posters ? You've done it to me, as well as lizbud. I'm sure she doesn't like it any better than I did.

The original topic of this post is firearms. Start a new topic about economics if that is what you are interested in.

Thank you Grace for saying what needed to be said.

[blue]

Where in this thread did I avoid this question?

So, are you implying that all all cultures where people are threatened by guns are inferior?
Also if you are saying everyone should carry a gun for defense and so on, doesn't that mean if every carried a nuclear weapon everyone else should? Can you imagine the problems that would cause? Where do you draw the line?

If that was a question you wanted to ask directly you should not have quoted yourself but asked it outright.

Quit reading between the lines, and stop looking to be offended. Im sorry I actually thought you where taking this conversation seriously.

[blue]

I think Blue just doesn't do nuance.

You? Think? LOL

Quoted for the Truth. I try not to read between the lines or nuance carp, it's absolute BS and is the same as spitting in someones face

I'm still waiting for for your defence of your mans economic policies. You belive in him. Tell me why Keynesian economics will work... You talk down to me about "facts". I am more than ready for this debate. I look forward to any responce you might have.

Why do you keep 'calling out' posters ? You've done it to me, as well as lizbud. I'm sure she doesn't like it any better than I did.

The original topic of this post is firearms. Start a new topic about economics if that is what you are interested in.

Just trying to confirm what I suspect. And if I DID start another thread, would you try to provide an answer?

No she/he wouldnt.

Only if it interested me, and only if I felt comfortable with my knowledge of the topic. I did respond to your topic on the Constitution - remember?

In the meantime, why don't you stop playing these silly games.

Way to dodge.

Thank you Grace for saying what needed to be said.

Qrace and Liz...


Dont try and act like moderators in my threads. If I have a problem with Puck, ya'll, Jebus, or anybody else highjacking my thread/s I will PM him/them to delete his/their posts.

[Whisk_Luva]

Where in this thread did I avoid this question?

If that was a question you wanted to ask directly you should not have quoted yourself but asked it outright.

Quit reading between the lines, and stop looking to be offended. Im sorry I actually thought you where taking this conversation seriously

I am telling you I posted it. I have no idea what happened to my post but I am going to ask Karen for help because this thread keeps being really strange with me.

Do you remember when you quoted me for saying:

And if you are saying that I am searching for the meaning behind your words and so on, then surely you are leaving things between the lines...

It was in that post. I don't know what happened to that post but now it's gone.

So I did ask it directly. I was quoting it because it was in a previous post.

I am not looking to be offended.

Anyway, I am sorry for my post disappearing and you getting the wrong end of the stick, but that is not my fault, and yes, I am taking the topic seriously.

I even have the thread that disappeared saved to my PC (I always save my posts on a document first because my network has issues and if the network goes off when I click post, I sometimes lose my posts).

Just because I pick out the meaning behind what you say doesn't make it a cultural issue. And if you are saying that I am searching for the meaning behind your words and so on, then surely you are leaving things between the lines...

You could of just used the word differences. That is not as insulting. The word 'issue' is implying paranioia anyway. So, are you implying that all all cultures where people are threatened by guns are inferior? Also if you are saying everyone should carry a gun for defense and so on, doesn't that mean if every carried a nuclear weapon everyone else should? Can you imagine the problems that would cause? Where do you draw the line? Because going by one of your main arguements, that situation would be ok.

So, would you like to answer my questions now?

[blue]

Face it, you have issues with people legally arming themselves to protect their rights. I have issues with people illegally arming themselves to take rights from others.

I have an issue with people being dissarmed so they cant defend their rights.

I live in, for the most part and for the immediate future, a free and open society and I like it that way and Ild like to keep it that way.

You should thank whatever belief system you have that you werent born in Switzerland or Israel, but if you where you wouldnt have the issues you currently have.