Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Cruel & Outdated Training Methods

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    You're assuming one thing....

    Time.

    We normally take someone from a basic first aid level of training to combat lifesaver (Iv's, advanced stabilization, wound treatment beyond first aid) in about 5-10 days. Normally it's done in that timespan due to operational needs.


    As far as the ER goes, if you find me an ER which will take non-medical specialty trained soldiers and let them into the ER for hands on treatment training, you're on. Somehow I sincerely doubt that either the general public or the insurance companies would ever let that happen.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human View Post
    You're assuming one thing....

    Time.

    We normally take someone from a basic first aid level of training to combat lifesaver (Iv's, advanced stabilization, wound treatment beyond first aid) in about 5-10 days. Normally it's done in that timespan due to operational needs.


    As far as the ER goes, if you find me an ER which will take non-medical specialty trained soldiers and let them into the ER for hands on treatment training, you're on. Somehow I sincerely doubt that either the general public or the insurance companies would ever let that happen.
    I'm not assuming anything. I'm not sure what you mean by that. As I stated in my previous post, poor planning from the beginning. And the pigs are the victims - this time.

    What about putting them in one of the medical units in Iraq - or Afghanistan - or the hospital in Germany? But then they would be practicing on the poor servicemen and women who are injured - again the result of poor planning.

    BTW - who is "we"?

  3. #3
    It's not poor planning, it's reality.

    Medical skills are an add on to other skills. If I'm reading the original story correctly,these are most likely soldiers who are highly trained infantrymen (Lrsd, spec ops) who are learning emergency med care prior to deployment. NOT average soldiers.

    Even in spec ops units, you have a fair amount of turnover. You need X number of trained CLS or other emergency med care specialists (normally around 20% of the soldiers in your units). One or more soldiers rotate to another unit, the skills have to be replaced, whether the incoming soldiers want to replace those skills or not.

    You WANTED to go to med school. The soldiers are being told "Here's your new job....and you also have to learn emergency medical care in addition to your MOS"


    As to "we", I'm recently retired, but I had to assist training CLS several times during my career, and trained soldiers throughout my career.

    CLS doesn't involve shooting pigs, the class the article is referring to is an extremely small number of soldiers.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Back to the original point of this topic. It seems that the military uses pigs in other ways that could also be labeled animal cruelty.

    Link to article.


    It's not poor planning, it's reality.
    No it was poor planning from the very beginning. Think May 1, 2003 - Mission Accomplished

  5. #5
    We're going to have to agree to disagree.

    Poor planning for 200 years? Somehow I doubt that. TRADOC has it's issues, but they do have a pretty good idea about how to train soldiers.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human View Post
    We're going to have to agree to disagree.

    Poor planning for 200 years? Somehow I doubt that. TRADOC has it's issues, but they do have a pretty good idea about how to train soldiers.
    Yes, we do disagree and neither of us will change the other's mind. No problem.

    Not sure where you got that 200 year figure. I was referring to the much more recent past - 2003. That's only 5 years by my calculations

Similar Threads

  1. outdated Drontal?
    By Emeraldgreen in forum Cat Health
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 08:17 PM
  2. How Could Someone Be So Cruel???
    By pinkelbows in forum Cat General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-02-2003, 06:29 AM
  3. Dog Training Methods
    By lizbud in forum Dog Behavior
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-10-2001, 10:36 AM
  4. Dog Training Methods
    By lizbud in forum Dog Behavior
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-10-2001, 10:36 AM
  5. Dog Training/Obedience... Best Methods....
    By ramanth in forum Dog General
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-13-2001, 07:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com