Again, I have no need to constantly attack you. I'm not attacking, I'm asking you why you continue to ask for data, when you're just going to ignore the data. If that's an attack, I must misunderstand the word.
I'm asking why you feel the persistent need to insult people you disagree with when you can't win the argument with facts.
I'm asking you why you consistently drag unrelated discussions into other threads. Senator Obama was mentioned nowhere in this thread, and the biddy comment was also in another thread. Neither comment has anything to do with the discussion at hand.
The previous firearms threads I mentioned are entirely germane to this discussion, and you have consistently argued against the second amendment. There are several threads where FBI crime data, the Lott study, and other data showing gun posession actually lowering crime rates were brought in, and you ignored the data, and insulted the people who posted the data. You forget those rather heated discussions, but manage to remember other things quite well.
Can the act, ES, it's really getting old. (Now THAT you can consider a personal attack. If I'm going to get accused of it, I may as well do it.)
Bookmarks