Untried? Inexperienced? How do you know? Just because a person does not have GOVERNMENT experience does not mean they are not unqualified.Originally Posted by pomtzu
A clean sweep would hardly be practical or possible unfortunately.
So she chooses "good unknowns". Untried, inexperienced, unqualified - just like she is. Isn't that the very reason why the majority of the people don't feel that she is ready for this appointment? I don't know about you, but I'm not willing to "take a chance" with my freedom and safety nor that of my children and grandchildren who will still be here long after I'm gone!!!
This is a vicious circle - I'm getting dizzy!!!!!
Indeed, the founders never intended for there to be career politicians.
What would you define as qualified? Just curious.
As for taking a chance with your freedom and safety... You are only promised freedom here, not safety. And from what I read in this thread, I think we all have a varying definition of what freedom is. Further, what does the government have to do with your safety? Physical and Fiscal security should be the responsibility of the individual. IMHO, of course.
An interesting read.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1220...n_commentaries
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks