No, what Kerry said was that Saddam was a threat and that he must be disarmed. This does not require war. It does require the threat of force, which is what he gave the President. It was not a vote for the war, but for the President to threaten war if Saddam didn't do what he needed to do.
Kerry's position is the same it's always been. Bush has made a mess, Kerry has an actual plan for how to fix it.
As for the debate, Kerry won it hands down. Bush looked angry, aggitated and annoyed to be there. He was overly defensive, sometimes confused and bumbling and just repeated the same lines over and over. He offered no new plans. Just more of the same. Four more years of this crap.
I can't believe anyone would vote for that.
Bookmarks