Originally posted by sirrahbed
Traditionally, Democrats are seen as being more concerned about the environment and so of course it must follow that President Bush does NOT care about it and I do NOT believe this is the case. I also do not believe many of the statements in that article that claim he has suspended so many environmental compliance acts are based on facts either.
What would it take for you to believe that Bush has not been an environmentally concerned president? Would you need the legislation he's signed? What organization do you trust?

I think you're letting your feelings about Bush distort the facts. I'm not a huge environmentalist, but I know enough to know that the environment is most definitely not on Bush's list of priorities.