So you know what I meant? Does that mean you were calling the troops that committed these acts honorable?!?!Originally posted by 2kitties
I know what ya mean Pops. Didn't mean to sound like I was pointing you out. Just wanted to clarify that there are decent- more decent than I'll ever be- people in the American service. And I know that there are more people than not in the service and even the goverment who have honorable intentions for this quagmire we call the war against terror.
Then there are those who make MILITARY prisoners get naked and be humiliated and abused.
Then there are these people: http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/...ain/index.html whose idea of en eye for an eye toward CIVILIANS is clearly nearsighted.My goodness. I don't think people forcing others to commit homosexual acts with each other, having sex with prisoners, pulling naked prisoners on a leash, terrorizing them by tying them up naked and surrounding them with dogs, abusing and humiliating them, etc. are honorable in ANY sense of the word! The soldier that has the most honor in my eyes is the one who exposed this whole situation. He sure is one wonderful, brave man, who had the courage to do the right thing. I know there are MANY good ones like him. I was only comparing the troops committing these abuses to Saddam.
I know.......I just read that story on CNN. I have no words to describe my anger on that.I hate these people. I hate all of this crap going on in the world. I hate it. Sickening..........absolutely sickening.
As to what you said about US troops doing it to military people, I'm listening to the radio right now, and they're saying 90% of the people held in the prison are innocent and have nothing to do with anything going on. 90% are NOT military prisoners. Our troops that did this, abused innocent people as well. I hate them all.....(the troops committing these crimes as well as those crazy, mad Al-Qaeda/Saddam people).
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks