Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human View Post
As to the people who were lost, prayers have already gone out.


When the German chancellor thinks she has enough evidence to run with, i think the case is fairly well closed. Details will emerge over time, but the 50000 ft view of the event is fairly clear, and as more information comes out it just looks more damning.

This isn't like other airline crashes where they had no physical evidence to work with. They got the black boxes fairly rapidly, and the airbus is fly by wire, so the telemetry and data recordings are direct inputs from the flight computers.
No question as to the general facts of the crash, someone 'allowed' a passenger jet to hit a mountain.

The 'whys' are what - if there is enough evidence left behind - need to be uncovered?
My questions are pretty simple, IF you wanted to crash a passenger airliner for revenge/religion/suicide, why would you fly it for 8 minutes AFTER you locked out the pilot?

The longer you fly a plane, with the idea that you want to destroy it, the longer you have to have your plot foiled or having someone or something intervene in you plans.

If you were going to try to pull off a terrorist attack, you have control of a plane that you can pretty much fly around and target a building or a town. As we saw on 9/11, you pretty much have to be Johnny-on-the-spot to defeat a terrorist attack by air.

People want to know the reason as to why this happened.

Something is off with this story - when you get certain clues or facts/behaviors as the story unfolds, you can say, "Oh, that makes sense...." Something is very off with this crash......But, that is my view about stuff - I tend to over analyze stuff like this.