That's where the "consequences" part comes in. Say, for example, marijuana becomes legal. A private corporation could still have a drug testing policy (my opinion on that is out of the scope of this debate) that people would have to comply with.
That's where the "consequences" part comes in. Say, for example, marijuana becomes legal. A private corporation could still have a drug testing policy (my opinion on that is out of the scope of this debate) that people would have to comply with.
Last edited by smokey the elder; 06-24-2011 at 10:38 AM. Reason: fat fingers
I've been finally defrosted by cassiesmom!
"Not my circus, not my monkeys!"-Polish proverb
Geez Karen. I was joking!
Which I am entitled to do after 20 or so years of dealing with drug testing. I have heard every excuse (poppy seeds, spiked punch, spiked pizza, took my daughter's cough medicine, was with granny while she was smoking medicinal marijuana, parties, etc.) With one employer I worked with DOT requirements for drug testing which are more stringent than others - which is what you are referring to with random in-service. Lots and lots of crazy stories with drug testing.
Probably more than 90% of people who "flunk" drug testing are positive for cannabis. With truck drivers it is often amphetamines.
Drug testing always includes a spectrum of drugs. And it has become a big business.
A client I was working with recently - a temporary employment agency - does their OWN drug testing. They have a machine in the office. Applicants "give a sample" and then it is processed through the machine in the office - on the spot so to speak. If they get a positive the applicant is sent to a medical clinic for further testing. Ick. But they cut the cost from $15 per test to a couple of dollars.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks