Quote Originally Posted by wombat2u2004 View Post
Then you have a problem don't you ???
You have a system that condones animal abuse on Youtube ???
I could go on and on.....a movie star who wines and dines the enemy in Hanoi while your soldiers starve in a pit, a supermarket in Texas that posts a sign saying we're closed today in honour of a martyr who slammed in to the WTC. Gee LH...this is all getting to be pretty stoopid.
You know what your amendments need ??? A can of petrol and a cigarette lighter.
Condones animal abuse? No, just doesn't allow an openly broad view of who is to be held accountable for animal abuse.

Hanoi Jane wasn't protected by the constitution, no one had the cojones to prosecute.

The grocery store in Texas is free to open and close as they wish, and post whatever signs they deem good in the windows...however they are also free to deal with the consequences.