Vick reinstated conditionally, may play by Week 6

**sasvermont** · 07-28-2009, 09:44 AM

One news report mentioned that IF a team picked him up, they should be prepared for a huge amount of backlash. I suspect that will be true. I wonder which team would be willing to take on that kind of loss, financially? New England has been mentioned. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. We shall see.

I think he should not be allowed to play ball.

**Medusa** · 07-28-2009, 11:30 AM

Originally Posted by sasvermont

One news report mentioned that IF a team picked him up, they should be prepared for a huge amount of backlash. I suspect that will be true. I wonder which team would be willing to take on that kind of loss, financially? New England has been mentioned. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. We shall see.

I think he should not be allowed to play ball.

Doubtful that it'll make a difference. The team who hires him knows what bad publicity comes w/it and they're obviously willing to take the risk, which tells me that the profits outweigh the risk or they wouldn't do it. People will get all fired up in football frenzy and they'll forget all about Vick's crime. Yeah, maybe they'll boo him for a while but if he repeatedly helps to bring about a win for his team, all will be forgiven. WE. DON'T. LEARN.