Who is to blame in THIS case?

[kokopup]

I don't Know how they could have a legitimate case. How can the county
control wild animals. Maybe they lost because they failed to post a
"wild boar crossing" sign. Go figure

They may have awarded more money if he had been sober.

[RICHARD]

Maybe they lost because they failed to post a
"wild boar cross" sign. Go figure

They may have awarded more money if he had been sober.

We have a winner= that was exactly the main reason the county lost!

Your prize........

A year's supply of virtual "free range" pork product!

[kokopup]

I guess "Wild Boar" qualifies as free range pork. I can come to visit my sister in Carmel Valley and just wait for 'road kill' on US Hwy 1. Then I can get the Real Thing Virtual usually leaves me with an empty feeling.

[TamanduaGirl]

Well the government claims to own all the wild animals. You need permits to hunt, permits to try and help an injured or orphaned one ect. Permits from the government because the government owns them. If you let animals you owned wander into the street and cause an accident you would be held liable. 'Bout time really.


In general I am for people being held accountable for their own actions instead but if they are going to claim ownership then they also get the responsibility.

[moosmom]

This is a perfect example that our lovely (NOT!!) judicial system does NOT work.

Poor little piggies.

As in the Jay Baldwin case, animals have absolutely no value to the judicial system. It sucks!!