Ms. Pelosi, Meet A,B,C,D,E,F,G and H!

[blue]

I have no idea who Nancy "Mussolini" Pelosi is but I am referring to the Speaker of the House...the third most powerful politician in the United States.

You may have heard of her.

And are you stalking me? You seem to attack me whenever I post without adding anything to the thread.

So you know who Nancy Pelosi is but not Nancy "Mussolini" Pelosi is, Ill clue you in they are the third most powerful polititian in the USA.

So power means superior to you?

And I could ask you the same question about stalking, at least when I reply to your posts I dont make belittling or insulting comments about you.

[Edwina's Secretary]

So...to get back on subject...what does Nancy Pelosi have to do with this woman birthing 14 children?

Anyone know?

[caseysmom]

So...to get back on subject...what does Nancy Pelosi have to do with this woman birthing 14 children?

Anyone know?

Because she has spoken of birth control in her life...come on ES

[Edwina's Secretary]

Because she has spoken of birth control in her life...come on ES

Oh of course! So let me see if I understand. Birth control is a bad thing...14 children is a good thing???

Where would I be without you to explain these things to me CM???

[blue]

Because she has spoken of birth control in her life...come on ES

A mother of 5, grandmother of 7, Mrs Pelosi telling others how many kids they should have so she can have more state and federal funds to further her own idealisms? Idealisms that in the end will not affect her in any way shape or form, finacially, or socially.

Pushing for more federal dollars, on top of the California state dollars, for contraceptives for US citizens as part of a stimulus package, thats saying lets spend money to save money.

None of us want our tax dollars to go to this womanedit*OctoMom*, but I would not deny the children my tax money if it meant their lives.

My conclusion from Mrs Nancy Mussolini Pelosi's statement is, its cheaper to abort then support.

[Edwina's Secretary]

Pushing for more federal dollars, on top of the California state dollars, for contraceptives for US citizens as part of a stimulus package, thats saying lets spend money to save money.

No, that's saying "let's spend money for the good of the country, its people and it limited resources." Less unplanned/unwanted pregnancies means less abortions, less poverty, less child abuse, less water rationing, less overcrowding. Those are good things.

Btw...who is your ghostwriter?

[pomtzu]

Let me just throw one more comment in for the vultures:

Regarding the woman that had invitro after her 3 children died - some here feel she was a "sicko" and guilty of producing "replacements".........what if she had tried and happened to get pregnant "naturally"?? Then what? Does that somehow make it "acceptable"? IMO - there is absolutely no difference what-so-ever!

You "replace" a car - you "replace" a pair of shoes, since you can get another the same or very similar. You don't get a "replacement" child - you get a totally different and unique individual!

[RICHARD]

A VULTURE CIRCLING IN!

Now a woman who IVFs a litter of kids because she had money to get them is no worse that a woman who has money and NKOTBs a set of triplets to makeup for the three she lost in an accident is different?

I really don't see the diff. The crash mom- again I am probably wrong about this- probably make some ducats off of the trucker, the company he drove for and what ever insurance the family had.....So why not?.

Go toss a few K at a physician and farm out three kids at once to ease the pain.

Again, How can anyone look into the faces of those children and not think that? ANd what kind of freaky bedtime stories will the kids get....

"These are pics your dead siblings-they died in a car crash.....You never met them, but then god blessed us with you three and now we are happy!"


That puts an effing blanket of security onto the kids, eh?


"Mommy, if one of us dies will you have more kids?"

LOL,
Bad enough we all get the "was I adopted" ideas as we grow up.....now the kids have to worry about being replaced. I really want to see the CF that family grows into.

[blue]

No, that's saying "let's spend money for the good of the country, its people and it limited resources." Less unplanned/unwanted pregnancies means less abortions, less poverty, less child abuse, less water rationing, less overcrowding. Those are good things.

If spending money for the good of the country was the issue, they would let us keep more of it to spend to build the economy.

We already have millions if not billions spent on preventing births, do they really need millions more to stimulate the economy?

An area dosent have to be overpopulated to have poverty, child abuse, or water rationing.

Btw...who is your ghostwriter?

Are you insulting me again? Or are you saying I should author Obama's next "self written" book?

[blue]

FWIW, I can see how a parent who lost a child would push to have another to fill the void left by the death of one child or all of their children.

I can understand that, I would not consider it sick but only natural.

[blue]

So...to get back on subject...what does Nancy Pelosi have to do with this woman birthing 14 children?

Anyone know?

Because the OP from the OP decided it should.

My state senator, the esteemed Nancy Pelosi, and Speaker of the House -commented about contraception and how it would effect the economy if 'unwanted' babies were never to be concieved.

This might be the video RICHARDwina was referring to, link. In this video, Mussolini in a skirt Pelosi dosent refer to 'unwanted' children, but children in general. Less money for children's health and education equals more money for the states fiscal health.