Results 1 to 15 of 406

Thread: Ms. Pelosi, Meet A,B,C,D,E,F,G and H!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kentucky, LAND OF THE EASILY AMUSED
    Posts
    25,224
    Quote Originally Posted by KYS View Post
    She doesn't have a job but wants lots of children which
    is her dream.

    Her dream is fine as long as she can care for and afford to care for them with-out my hard earned money..
    At this point I hope she gets lots of $$$ deals so the tax payers do
    not have to foot the bill. JMHO
    Who was this Dr. anyway who implanted her when she already had 6 children and no job?

    http://news.aol.com/article/octuplet...509x1201254495

    We are stuck with the bill, yet all the people who don't want the government or big brother getting involved with the 'sectshul' habits of the North American
    Morons aren't happy either way.


    Woman want to have birth control covered by BB, but don't want the men to have Viagra?

    We want to have kids but don't want BB to control the embryo implantation numbers? " I want three and then tie the tubes!"

    You can go to a clinic and get invitro 7 times like this woman has had, but other woman want the insurance to cover the cost of them getting treatments to get pregnant?


    EFF THAT.

    If you can't do it on your own, do a Angelina, I can't stand that kook, but at least she goes and takes care of the anklebiters from other countries.

    This whole scene just shows the frantic labels we have put on motherhood and how 'invalid' women are if they can't become mothers.

    We think that it's o.k., like the woman who lost her three kids in an accident then gets in-vitro to replace them, like three new humans will ever take up the room in her heart!

    Then we have problems with some idiot who squeezes out eight at once?


    -----------------

    In the early years of EABs (abortions) you had to go see a shrink, now you can toss out any reason to kill a kid,

    THe opposite is true with kids. No woman feels fulfilled unless they spend money trying to get pregnant..

    I am tired of spending MY TAX dollars funding fertility clinics for women who are dumb enough to believe that popping out a kid makes them a More Valuable Person in the world.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Ellen Goodman has an opinion piece about this mess. the last paragraph pretty much sums it up -

    But right now, a reproductive business that generates so much controversy has produced a remarkable consensus. Infertility treatment for an unemployed, single mother of six? Eight embryos in one womb? There must be a proper word in the medical literature to describe this achievement. I think the word is "nuts."

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by RICHARD View Post
    We are stuck with the bill, yet all the people who don't want the government or big brother getting involved with the 'sectshul' habits of the North American
    Morons aren't happy either way.


    Woman want to have birth control covered by BB, but don't want the men to have Viagra?

    We want to have kids but don't want BB to control the embryo implantation numbers? " I want three and then tie the tubes!"

    You can go to a clinic and get invitro 7 times like this woman has had, but other woman want the insurance to cover the cost of them getting treatments to get pregnant?


    EFF THAT.

    If you can't do it on your own, do a Angelina, I can't stand that kook, but at least she goes and takes care of the anklebiters from other countries.

    This whole scene just shows the frantic labels we have put on motherhood and how 'invalid' women are if they can't become mothers.

    We think that it's o.k., like the woman who lost her three kids in an accident then gets in-vitro to replace them, like three new humans will ever take up the room in her heart!

    Then we have problems with some idiot who squeezes out eight at once?


    -----------------

    In the early years of EABs (abortions) you had to go see a shrink, now you can toss out any reason to kill a kid,

    THe opposite is true with kids. No woman feels fulfilled unless they spend money trying to get pregnant..

    I am tired of spending MY TAX dollars funding fertility clinics for women who are dumb enough to believe that popping out a kid makes them a More Valuable Person in the world.
    Wow...that has to be the most misogynistic rant I have seen! Just Wow!

    Why do you hate women so much???....and please...after reading the above there is NOTHING you can say that would suggest you do anything but hate women.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    Wow...that has to be the most misogynistic rant I have seen! Just Wow!

    Why do you hate women so much???....and please...after reading the above there is NOTHING you can say that would suggest you do anything but hate women.
    After reading your posts in this thread, about having to pay for this womans children with your tax dollars, I dont see much of a difference between his post and your posts.

    Im suggesting that if a woman wrote what RICHARD did you wouldnt have a problem, but since RICHARD isnt a woman, yes I'm assuming here, you have a problem with what he wrote.

    So why do you hate men and single mothers?
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    .

    So why do you hate men and single mothers?
    Okay...I understand "one for all and all for one"...but try ...reading. I have said repeatedly my issue is not with this woman's marital status, nor her ability to pay.

    My issue is with the limited resources of the planet and people overbreeding. Married, single, divorced, widowed...don't care.

    So please...to use your usual line....could you please show me WHERE I have demonstrated hate of single mothers or men? How about a link?

    And didn't anyone every tell you about Assuming????

    How about putting up or shutting up?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    Okay...I understand "one for all and all for one"...but try ...reading. I have said repeatedly my issue is not with this woman's marital status, nor her ability to pay.

    My issue is with the limited resources of the planet and people overbreeding. Married, single, divorced, widowed...don't care.

    So please...to use your usual line....could you please show me WHERE I have demonstrated hate of single mothers or men? How about a link?

    And didn't anyone every tell you about Assuming????

    How about putting up or shutting up?
    You first. Prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that RICHARD hates women.

    To quote you.

    How about putting up or shutting up?
    ETA: You have made the grand assumption that RICHARD Hates women.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    You first. Prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that RICHARD hates women.

    To quote you.



    ETA: You have made the grand assumption that RICHARD Hates women.
    In other words...you are unable to back up your statement that I "hate men and single moms." Got it. Odd...since earlier you wrote that.... from what I had written in this thread....you knew it.

    Oh yeah...there is nothing that is "grand" nor is an "assumption" about my statement.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    I did.

    Coward.
    No you didnt. Hypocrite.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    Well played....for a fouth grader.
    According to you, RICHARD not wanting want to pay for said mothers 14 children he is a misogynist. You dont want to pay for said mothers 14 children, you are a misogynist and a hypocrite.

    Edit: I got the quote in before you could delete your post!
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

Similar Threads

  1. Had to share! I got a meet & greet to meet..
    By CountryWolf07 in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-26-2005, 11:23 PM
  2. Look who we got to meet!
    By RubyMutt in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-31-2004, 02:28 PM
  3. Come and meet...
    By catnapper in forum Cat General
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-28-2004, 02:48 PM
  4. OK, so when is the first/next PA dog meet?
    By Adge Gibbs in forum Dog General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-14-2002, 07:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com