Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: The US Constitution

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    So you think slavery and women not being able to vote -- original intent! are good things?
    Absolutly not and Im offended you would even suggest I did. Part of the original intent of the Constitution was that it could and would be changed with the amendment process, not to be interpreted to conform to the views of those in power.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    Part of the original intent of the Constitution was that it could and would be changed with the amendment process, not to be interpreted to conform to the views of those in power.
    So you support change (aka amendment) to the Constitution?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    So you support change (aka amendment) to the Constitution?
    When properly warrented yes I do. If it expands the size, reach, and power of the government I do not
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    When properly warrented yes I do. If it expands the size, reach, and power of the government I do not
    So who decides "properly warranted"? The "people in power?"

    What does the Constitution have to do with the size of the government. The Bush Administration has GREATLY expanded the size (and power) of the federal government without touching the Constitution (or reading it I think...)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Posts
    20,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    What does the Constitution have to do with the size of the government. The Bush Administration has GREATLY expanded the size (and power) of the federal government without touching the Constitution (or reading it I think...)
    Yea, when the Constitution was written there were only 13 colonies, therefore, small representation. Baby, look at us now!!!
    No matter what anyone does, someone some where will be offended some how!!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    MY BLESSINGS:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Grandma (RB), Chester, Angel, Chip

    Leonardo (RB), Luke (RB), Winnie, Chuck,

    Frankie

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    WHERE YOU ARE IS WHERE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    So who decides "properly warranted"? The "people in power?"

    What does the Constitution have to do with the size of the government. The Bush Administration has GREATLY expanded the size (and power) of the federal government without touching the Constitution (or reading it I think...)
    We the People decide what is properly warranted, as laid out in the Constitution's amendment process.

    The Constitution lays out what the federal government can and cant do. Bush cant do anything without the approval of Congress, its called balence of powers.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    We the People decide what is properly warranted, as laid out in the Constitution's amendment process.

    The Constitution lays out what the federal government can and cant do. Bush cant do anything without the approval of Congress, its called balence of powers.
    You have just made an EXCELLENT argument for not having any fears for the Constitution regardless of who is elected this week!

    Well done!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary View Post
    You have just made an EXCELLENT argument for not having any fears for the Constitution regardless of who is elected this week!

    Well done!
    Wrong.

    If the Democrats win the White House and a super majority in the House and Senate, the outlook on SCOTUS could be very much changed and the hard left leadership can pass whatever they want. Its not just about who wins the White House this time around..
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

Similar Threads

  1. The US Constitution
    By Puckstop31 in forum Dog House
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 02:07 PM
  2. New Preamble To The Constitution
    By wombat2u2004 in forum Dog House
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-21-2007, 10:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com