That's pretty much what I figured. I don't have anything in writing. I just can't believe that they would do this to me. I don't know what to do...Originally Posted by Sirrahsim
That's pretty much what I figured. I don't have anything in writing. I just can't believe that they would do this to me. I don't know what to do...Originally Posted by Sirrahsim
Do you have a union rep or anything like that??
I'd at least get a consultation with an attorney, if they can hear what you have to say, and give you free advice about whether a suit would be warranted. Employers are crappy like that. I know where I work, in a school district, we are guaranteed our job back, and the same position, but the same position in the same building, only for so long. It's in our contract that way.
Last edited by jennielynn1970; 01-12-2008 at 04:19 PM. Reason: editing a moderator's edit
Yeah, it sounds like he is offering you your same position back, and has even offered to make some accommodations if you just want to fill in for people who are on vacation (which may turn out to be part time work). But he is not required to create a new part time position for you, if you should turn down his offer. Your old position will be filled by your replacement when/if you decide not to return full-time.
I am going to add another wrinkle to this equation. I know two of the ladies in our office went out on FMLA to have a baby, then decided that they were not returning to work at all. They were required to pay back certain benefits (medical?) they received while they were out, because they did not return to the payroll. I am just throwing that out there. Check to make sure that will not happen to you if you decide not to return full-time. It may be worth it to you to go back to work just for a month or so, so that you do not lose any benefits. Also, if the other girl sees that you are returning to work, she may change her mind after being unemployed for a month and be willing to job share as originally planned.
Ooh, ES you must have been posting when I was. Have you heard anything similar to the situation where the ladies had to reimburse the county for benefits when they didn't return to work?
GM...yes recovery of medical premiums is possible. Without quoting the entire reg...basically
If the employee fails to return from leave or returns and works less than 30 calendar days...the employer can recover its share of the cost of group health care premium payments. If the failure to return is for reason beyond the control of the employee or because they continue to be sick...employer can't recover.
p.s. in my experience it is not often done....
I pretty much figured that I couldn't do anything legally - I am just hurt and surprised that he would do this. I don't have any benefits or insurance there, so that's not a problem. And I am not in a union. I don't know what I am going to do as of now.....I certainly didn't want to have to look for another job while taking care of a newborn. I don't know, maybe I will just see if they will lay me off and let me collect unemployment for a few months. Ugh
That may not be a bad option, either. Just consider all the twists and turns, maybe write it out if that works for you. See what pops out at you.Originally Posted by JenBKR
.
I am not familiar with Pennsylvania unemployment, but it is possible if you return to work with reduced hours you can still collect -- although it will be a reduced amount.
Two things about FLMA...it only applies if your employer has 50 or more employees and, as Sirrahsim says...your employer is only required to return you to same or substantial similar work. Full to part time would not be same. There are other restictions as well.
Sorry - negoitations are your best bet.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks