Jen, this doesn't sit well with me, and I don't think you mean it as it was worded, since I 'know' you. That bad stuff happens much worse every day doesn't change that THIS is a bad thing, and is 'deserving' of our attention, too. Sure, lots of worse things happen, but, that shouldn't detract from this situation.Originally Posted by jenluckenbach
Honesty or dishonesty doesn't make give this woman any more character, IMO. If I say, "I hate you" and slap you across the face, my statment of hate doesn't support my action, does it? Yet, I am being 'honest'.Originally Posted by jenluckenbach
The difference with Donna's situation was HER needs were put second. She rehomed her pets because it was best for THEM. Not her. In fact, if she could have done it differently, I think she would have preferred they stay with her. It wasn't like Donna said, "Oh, I am tired of having so many cats, some have got to go!". Of course, Donna is quite able to speak for herself, so, I will conclude with this is MY interpretation of her situation. An interpretation for which I could very well be wrong.Originally Posted by jenluckenbach
I think the wrongness here is the desensitizing effect the article could have on people 'ditching' pets. The more we hear, support, agree with lame reasons to ditch our pets, the more it happens. It is changing the minds of individuals, one at a time, to support inclusion, responsibility, commitment and love, that needs work here. Not articles putting a positive spin on 'ditching' family pets.
Bookmarks