Gosh i support so many of you on this issue, i can see every point of view and it is always the good pet owners who get punished because of the bad ones, we get a raw deal.

However licencing in this country could be beneficial i think, as i personally have come up against a problem that maybe could have been fixed if licencing were in place.

For me it would be hard to find extra cash to pay for it, but if it mean't other pets were being protected then so be it, i think offering people maybe a small incentive reward would be the way to go for licencing their pets.


When i reported nikki and ellie's former bad owner to the SPCA, because of neglect of one of their kittens which was now a young cat and had been badly injured, they could do nothing as she denied ownership, that is where licencing can sort that problem out,this poor kitty was left suffering,in a terrible state, however don't worry folks i managed to capture it and end its suffering, but this is just one case of how this could indeed be helpful.

I think 50 dollars is a reasonable amount,not outrageous and one that i would be prepare to pay.

The one thing that riles me is the people of that town, give this woman no thanks for stopping ferals from breeding,they should be thankful that someone is doing the right thing.

It is the same for me, if i had not spayed ellie and nikki and Zara we would have been unindated by ferals here,then all of a sudden everyone would have cared, and they would have all been killed, i often think of that when i look at nikki and ellie knowing how sweet they are and shudder at the thought, i must remind my elderly neighbour when she has a moan to me about the cats, of course it is only my cats, could never be anyone elses, although we have hundreds in the neighbourhood lol.