I think both sides are guilty.

I know the mother of the boy isn't credible and the boy has caused his own fair share of problems as well. But its not like this was the only incident. There were so many boys who had stories. He didn't molest them all of course, but what about the child (male) porn he showed them? They found that in his house as evidence, and many boys described it. There were also fingerprints so that is undeniable evidence. Not evidence of molestation, but evidence that he did show them that kind of stuff. What in the world did he do that for?????? I know the whole case might be filled with circumstantial evidence, but I think that there is just SO much of it, that all put together it does make somewhat of a case. I thought they had definately proven the alcohol claims. Seemed like there was really good evidence for that. Even if he didn't molest the children, he was doing some VERY WRONG stuff!!!!

I know that my children would never be allowed to sleep in his, or ANY other adult's, bed ... thats for sure. I do partially blame the dumb parents for leaving their children to his care.

Just my opinions...