I agree with you. I just thought it was funny. I remember in the eighties/early nineties, there was a famous photographer that documented everything her kids went thtrough... bath time, broken arms, losing baseball game, etc. People were up in arms about her because they said she was being abusive to her kids. Why? Because she 1) photographed them naken (in a BATH) and published the photos, and 2)photographed her kid in pain and published the photos.

I am not advocating child porn. That is a whole entity of its own. Its gross and filthy and someone needs to have their heads checked if it seems in any way seductive to them.

It sounds as if what the unlucky Pee Wee happened to have some old time art photos. Sheesh... when I did an online art search, I came across PLENTY of naked pictures that my blocking software didn't block... but since it was photographed with composition and light in mind, it was considered art instead of porn.

I wonder if the items in question really were porn or art... but since I'm not too interested in looking at the pictures myself, I'll go along the lines of thinking that they are once again using a famous person as a warning to people. Ya know, they gotta get someone's head to make the papers and then they can say "we're cracking down on this tyoe of crime."