Read it carefully:

(1) The owner demonstrates, by providing a copy of his or her
business license and federal and state tax number, or by other means,
as determined by the local entity authorized to issue permits, that
he or she is doing business and is licensed as a breeder by the local
jurisdiction or its authorized local animal control agency.
Above are USDA licensed bulk producers of animals that have licenses to conduct regular business. They are exempted and allowed to carry on bulk production and sales as usual.

(2) The owner sufficiently demonstrates, as determined in the
discretion of the local entity authorized to issue intact permits,
all of the following:
(A) His or her cat or dog is used to show or compete and has
competed in at least one legitimate show or sporting competition
within the last two years.
(B) His or her cat or dog is a valid breed that is recognized by
an approved registry.
(C) The cat or dog has earned, or if under two years old, is in
the process of earning, a conformation, obedience, agility, carting,
herding, protection, rally, sporting, working, or other title from an
approved purebred registry or association.
Have you ever competed in a dog show with a four month old puppy? Do you realize they must be 6 months of age before they can do so?

(3) The dog is appropriately trained and meets the
definition of guide dog, service dog, or signal dog, as set forth in
subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) of Section 365.5 of the Penal Code.
There are no 4 month puppies that can pass that tests of d, e, f of penal code 365.5

I strongly suspect you have not read the Penal code.

No puppies at four months are certified, none are in training for use as service dogs.
see the code
http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/365.5.html

Can a four month puppy do that?
Do you personally know otherwise?

If you don't also want to undermine police dog training, do check out my first post in this series. It is text in an letter written against AB 1634 from a major police dog training organization in this country. Source was provided.

Do take the time to comprehend what you read.

This may not even be a sticking point to many supporters, but the latest draft of amendments includes a BAIT and SWITCH now that it has the blind support of many who are not reading it.

For those that haven't read the amendment-------

Levine amended the bill just before the last Assembly meeting, because he
realized he would be asked how it would be funded and he was.

This is important: Whereas the bill was more 'feel good' previously -- originally the penalty fees to be collected from pet owners were going to be targetted for FREE or discount neuter...

HERE is the original wording:
The bill would require all revenues derived from these fines to be used for funding free and low-cost spay and neuter programs, and outreach efforts for these programs, which would be required to be established by each local animal control agency, to the extent that funding is available, and for the enforcement of these provisions.
The amendment changed it to:
It would require all revenues derived from these fines to be used for funding the enforcement of these provisions , and, to the extent funding is available, free and low-cost spay and neuter programs, and outreach efforts for those programs, which would be required to be established by each local animal control agency
Analysis: He moved the priority to ENFORCEMENT rather than for funding free/discount S/N.
(see
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ )

Will we will be funding our own guillotines.

Do you have rescues you are rehabbing? Do you take back dogs that don't work out when initially placed? Does that put you just a little over the pet limit in your district? Are you babysitting a family member's dog while they are on vacation or in the hospital? Can you afford the licensing fees for every one of a whole litter of puppies you are trying to rehome for rescue?

Incidently, Albuquerque's MSN has just gone into effect. Albuquerque is talking about canvassing neighborhoods. Stopping people with pets on the street and asking for proof of compliance with the new Ordinance.