She can't really put a copyright sign on a siggy using pictures that she didn't take. Technically she is supposed to have permission from the photographers before she uses them. (i.e. when I used a Barbaro signature for awhile, I had permission from the photographer and did not alter the pictures in any way, plus gave her credit). Also she made it and posted that others could use it. I'd be more inclined to say something to the person if they were using pictures of someone else's pets claiming the pets were theirs. If the person is just trying to honor Steve by using it I would let it go. Just my opinion.
Bookmarks