I never "stuck up" for the bill targeting specific breeds and I prefer to actually read all involved with something before I mindlessly make my opinion. The amendments were what made the difference for me, not the original bill. I agreed that the breed specific part was not good, but I also felt that it was NOT a step toward breed banning, and that there IS good in it in that it targets backyard breeding. I never said I wanted the bill to pass, I DID say that I felt that for the first time people are being listened to as regards to alternative steps to banning or breed extinction (forcing all to be neutered/spayed and all shelter dogs euthanized, etc.) The Sorryagain.com I think is a wonderful show of unity by dog lovers to protest breedism and BSL. If the bill was combating all backyard breeding I'd be more in support of it. However a lot of the pics on the sorryagain.com site talk about dogs being taken away and dogs being euthanized, and I could see no place in this amended bill where it said that would happen. It sends a strong message though and I very much enjoyed looking at each and every picture, all 200 some pages of them. I'm sorry you are angry at my opinions.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks