Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: CKC

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dorset, England
    Posts
    3,317
    Originally posted by cali
    lol UKC is over here, Blair is UKC registered.
    This is UKC in USA
    http://www.ukcdogs.com/

    and this is UKC in Canada
    http://www.ukc.ca

    Eventhough the names are the same, they are actually unrelated. UKC of USA was founded in 1898 by C. Z. Bennett for the purpose of emphasizing each breed's individual working qualities. UKC of Canada, on the other hand, formerly called The Ladies Kennel Club of Canada, was founded in 1917 by a group of Montreal women. The name was changed in 1964 to The United Kennel Club when they decided to admit male members.

    -edit-
    sorry I put the wrong link before
    the website for UKC in Canada is http://www.ukc.ca
    Last edited by vinjashira; 03-18-2005 at 02:13 AM.

    thanks k9krazee for the signature!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,039
    Isn't the FCI pretty much the controlling body of
    at least 35 International
    kennel clubs? I believe Japan (JKC) and parts of Europe
    follow FCI rules?
    I remember reading about an Akita breeder who falsely registered a
    litter under a different pure bred sire.
    (their were two separate pure bred litters at the time).
    This person was banned from
    AKC. I used to read about Akita breeders being banned
    for a time on the quartarly ACA reports
    for varies reasons.
    Believe it or not the AKC does try to police and try
    to keep accurate records.
    I would think the official breed clubs have a lot of impute also
    on how things are done.

    Wouldn't it be wonderful if DNA became the norm.

    P.S. I wanted to add, I am not keen on AKC for different reason's.
    I think AKC needs to do a lot more than be a record keeping and
    information business for pure-bred dogs.
    Even thought the Breed clubs along with AKC do some
    wonderfull things such as donating money to Vet hospitals for research they need to do more IMHO.
    THey need to police and start requirering healthy tests (DNA)
    on sire and dams before a dogs litter can be registered.
    Might help elimanate some of puppy mills if they have to
    make sure their stock passes certain health tests to bred.
    It might not be the answer but maybe a start.
    Last edited by KYS; 03-17-2005 at 09:35 PM.


    ----<---<--<{(@

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sask. Canada
    Posts
    6,001
    nope the canadian UKC you posted does not recignize BCs, the one that does most stuff here does, and lost of people here register BCs with them for whatever reason, not for showing lol mostly just for their activitys, and we almost registered Happy with them as well. Blair is registered with the one you called the american version, I have never even heard of that canadian version lol
    Shayna
    Mom to:
    Misty-10 year old BC Happy-12 year old BC Electra-6 year old Toller Rusty- 9 year old JRT X Gem and Gypsy- 10 month ACD X's Toivo-8 year old pearl 'Tiel Marley- 3 year old whiteface Cinnamon pearl 'Tiel Jenny- the rescue bunny Peepers the Dwarf Hotot Miami- T. Marcianus

    "sister" to:

    Perky-13 year old mix Ripley-11 year old mix

    and the Prairie Clan Gerbils

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,637
    Thanks for all the input! I like how the AKC makes sure the dog breed is very recognised and popular before they regester any old breed.

    Niņo & Eliza



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com