I dunno...I think I understand this "low maintenance" statement. When we first got Rizzo, we spent over a thousand dollars on cat supplies, checkups, neutering, microchipping, medicine, etc. We can't leave town for more than a day without making arrangements for his care. We spent a whole day cat-proofing our place, and we still have to be SUPER careful not to leave out shoes or anything with strings on them. We lose sleep every night when he decides to get vocal, and he wakes us up every morning. We can't eat off of paper plates without him thinking he's going to get a Fancy Feast treat, and therefore tripping us, crying at us, clawing at the cabinets and just generally being un-ignorable. The litter box is a non-neglectable chore, and there's a lot of extra sweeping involved. We've spent a LOT of time scrubbing the carpet and giving him partial baths after he drags his tail in the litter box. He needs a good grooming at least once a week and a claw-trim once every two weeks. He doesn't like to entertain himself and demands to be played with...constantly! But I still consider him "low maintenance" compared with a dog, for the simple reason that we don't have to walk him every 6 hours!Originally posted by PayItForward
This statement alone worries me. You might not have to walk a cat (well unless you live in the USA) but a cat takes up a lot of time.
I just re-read that paragraph and realized it sounds like I'm complaining. I'm not! I'd do anything for my Rizz. I just wanted to point out that just because someone considers a pet comparitively low maintenance doesn't mean that they're not prepared to do anything and everything necessary to care for him.
![]()
Bookmarks