Originally posted by Tubby & Peanut's Mom
I, in no way, agree with the shooting of the cat, but....Wal-Mart property is Wal-Mart property, not public property. Wal-Mart bought and paid for the property and they are paying the property taxes on it, so it is their property and yes, technically they have the right to do whatever they want on their private property - within the law.
Oops...sorry, my mistake. Just the thought that allowing firearms at retail stores scares me. I can understand doing whatever you want on private property (I was thinking of homes here, didn't even consider stores as private property, but you're right) within reason, but shooting IMO is not one of them.
moosmom, I was thinking the same thing about the city limits...

Perhaps this is one of the reasons I moved away from Indiana. Just that statement about "blown it into little bitty pieces" that "Attorney Michael Keating" made makes me sick. Heartless sicko. I think that's a little extreme and in no way makes it right...private property or not. We need harsher punishment for animal cruelty...period.

You are right Richard, they shot the cat multiple times. Nice, huh?