As much as I believe he is guilty, I worry about this case being used to hang/convict future cases of innocent people (women included) where we may not feel so sure. Circumstancial evidence only (the hair was positive for "mitochondrial" match- that is not 100 percent sure that it is Lacie's no matter what we think!) This is setting a precedence in trial history. If I am wrong, please correct me! (again- I "know" he did it!)