That's alright Pam...I voted for Nixon once!

But O'Reilly is being disingenuous here. He nearly breaks his arm patting himself on the back. I can cite plenty of examples of liberals criticising other liberals....although I am hard pressed to find in this article where O'Reilly actually criticises anyone except Whoopi Goldberg and Michael Moore. Ann was just simply making fun when she calls Edwards a pretty-boy milquetoast, but Whoopi was being dishonorable when she mocked Bush.

He refers to those who believed Bush lied as bomb-throwers. Is that simply making fun or mocking????? Or dishonorable? I didn't see anyone throw any bombs?

Just look at the difference here....when he speaks of Clinton he says..."deeds that were unproven and sometimes even defamatory."

Bush's critics meanwhile "had no proof to begin with. They are guilty of a slander, a dishonorable act."

So we have unproven and sometimes defamatory on the one hand and no proof = slander and a dishonorable act on the other.

Fair and balanced????