No.
I think it's meddling a bit too much with nature when the byproduct of nuclear energy takes quarter of a million years to break down. There are many other forms of energy that, yes, cost a lot to establish, but provide cleaner forms of energy. For example, a single wind turbine can power hundreds of homes.
There are shiploads of nuclear waste travelling the world's waters every day, because countries want nuclear energy, but don't want the waste sitting in their backyards. I think if you want this sort of energy, you need to be accountable for it from start to finish.
Bookmarks