Originally posted by PepperRSM
If them having sex is what you're against, why can't they get married? They're going to have sex married or not, so what does it matter? Stopping gay marriages is not going to stop them from having sex.
It doesn't make a difference to me whether they are married or not. I'm against what they are doing whether it is in terms of marriage, or out of marriage. Why I don't like them getting married is because I don't see this as marriage at all. I find it against the basis of marriage, and the significance of marriage.

Putting that point aside, I have a question, or say, an argument to make, to those of you who justify gay marriages with letting them marry whoever they're in love with. Since someone said previously that you can't marry a pet or a car because they have no say in the decision, I would like to ask you this. Say a girl loves her brother, and wants to marry him. Why is it against the law to marry someone so close in kin? After all, it shouldn't be anyone's problem who someone else wants to marry (according to many of you). Is the government discriminating by making it against the law to marry a sibling? What if someone doesn't believe its wrong, and wants to do that? Why is THAT against the law? Now if any one of you says they should be allowed to do that too, if they wish, seriously, I would faint.

Please tell me, if that is allowed to be banned by law, why not gay marriages? They are both *immoral actions*, as defined by religion.