Originally posted by DJFyrewolf36
I've said it before...

if PETA is so concerned about "animal rights" *I use the term very loosely here* then why do they think that killing people and blowing up buildings will help the cause? I can only see one small advantage...if the building is gone, maybe a spotted owl can move in
Too bad you can't see sarcasim online...
Much like the Right to Life bunch that blows up abortion clinics and kill doctors that perform abortions....

By what means does the vet get his "message" out? The message is benign enough...how he carries it out is what concerns me. PETA's idea is a good one, but they carry it too far and use questionable means to pass their message along.