For one, it's his fault that his dogs are getting aten. If he didn't bring them out there in the first place, or if he hadn't of let them loose- they wouldn't have gotten ate. The stupid man doesn't even seem upset that his dogs were killed from the sounds of it in the article. I wouldn't even be able to go back out hunting after the first one was killed. Seems as if they're just tools instead of pets to him, like property. It's not the wolf's fault -- he saw it as a free meal.

And, if he did think of them as pets -- NOTHING would compensate for the loss of them.

What does he want from wolves? does he want the species to die off completely? Does he want his other "dogs" to be able to eat a wolf... what could he possibly get out of it?