I have to respectfully disagree. I haven't seen anything I would categorize as vulgar. Have you guys watched prime time TV lately? I do not see talk of alcohol as offensive at all and the sexual inuendo- well again, perfectly innocent.
We ask that people not be so thin-skinned here in the dog house because we discuss controversial topics. We allow teenagers to completely trash talk their parents, we allow religious arguements, discussions that sometimes get outright mean. It's all life, folks. Learn to deal. If it gets so sensored that we can't even have a real debate or if we completely lose our sense of humor- well, then it's lost its appeal as far as I'm concerned.
Edit: and here is a Dog House idea: if someone is too immature to read very veiled, mostly innocent sexual joking, then are they really mature enough to be surfing internet message boards? Probably not. It's most likely a situation where parents should be better monitoring their child's internet usage. I can't imagine a child under the age of 12 being allowed to use the internet without supervision. I am sure that supervision isn't happening as it should, but it is not my responsiblity to parent cyberspace.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks