There was a line going about Leo last friday. It isn't there today - don't know why but i think it was my fault. I played devil's advocate about the Leo incident trying to look at the big picture and poof the line disappeared. so i'll try again....
The trial for this case is set for June so we won't know anything until then (right now the guy doesn't have a lawyer yet- or as of friday the 13th).
Let me preface this entire thing with Leo was too cute to die and seems like it was senseless. But in this particular case (and only this case!) there is somethings that smell bad here in the san jose area.
The entire country never would have herad of this had it not been for a slow news day. The incident took place about a month before the media looked at it.
There are rumblings that the lady (who is playing the innocent victim) isn't innocent - that she was just as abusive to the guy she rearended as he was to her. there are also reports that she struck or scratched him. And in the melee Leo tried to protect and paid a price. It is also reported that leo attacked not once but twice. suppose this was just a knee jerk reaction to saving one's own face? Granted not the best reaction at all! But we do have a justice system that is getting tougher and tougher on animal rights and crimes against animals (yahoo! its about time!) They will find the truth I trust them to do that much. (what if we find out that the lady threw Leo at the man?! yuk!!!!)
And then there is the reward fund $110,000 for the dog and only $50,000 for the reward fund for Xiana Fairchild - remember her? four months before Leo she was abducted - her skull was found just last month. Her killer is still at large.
Again this is just ponders....
It is all a BIG ponder!