I have done searches for more information on this topic with no success. But yesterday, I caught a portion of a radio talk show where it was being discussed. I wish I had more time to listen to it, so I could speak more intelligently on the subject. What I did hear was that the beef is more in that it is government land that would be used for this camp. The host and one of the callers suggested that if it was the Baptist church, for example, that was wanting to hold a religious camp on this government property, they would have been denied immediately. Could this be part of the reason for the decision?
If anyone has any more information, I'd love to be steered to it.
Bookmarks