Originally posted by yorkster

You hear people say the word OIL when that question is put out there, and honestly I have to wonder........................

Nobody yet has really given a good (or even fair) answer to that.
Maybe you could shed some light, because if there is a explanation, I would like to know what it is. I always have desire to fully understand all sides of things.

blood for oil...

here we go............

why would be send our troops to take over the oil fields in iraq when .......

we could have bought the oil for ourselves under the "FOOD FOR OIL" sanctions we lobbied for against iraq- let the iraqis do ALL the work and we benefit from their labor...isn't that the American way???? lol.....why go in and take the chance that saddam would destroy the oil fields before we get our hands on them-that would set back the plans for our world conquest, no? oh wait, we want to get OUR people in there to rebuild the oil pumping stations, waste years building the oil infrastructure, and then get the oil!!!!!!!....it flies in the face of common sense......


and do debunk another cliche....-GW STOLE, WAS ANOINTED INTO
THE PRESIDENCY....
if i remember correctly AG had a chance to win 49 other states,
(oh to lose your home state, tennesee, in a pres election!!!!)
he won, some lost others......had he been a better candidate
and ralph nader not run...things may have been a bit different..


but i may be wrong....