Originally posted by popcornbird


So you are saying its justified to use an ATOMIC bomb and kill millions of innocent civilians that had NOTHING to do with the war??? They could have used a regular bomb. They could have done the same as what Japan did to them. WHY did they have to use a "weapon of mass destruction?" The President at the time was insane, that's all I can say. INSANE. And anyone supporting the crime he committed by nuking millions of people is insane too. NO the Pearl Harbor attack was NOT justified, but nuking a country like that is MORE unjustified. The fact is that some people just don't have a heart in regards to people of other nations. The Pearl Harbor was not justified at all, but killing millions of innocent people like that was a crime aganst humanity.
A real crime against humanity was what the Nazi's did to the Jews. They were totally innocent. While dropping the bomb on Japan was a horrible thing, it WAS an act of war. I believe if the Japanese had the bomb they would of used it on us too. I do not believe there is a justification meter saying one way of killing is more justified than another. Killing is killing is killing. Unfortunately, that happens in war.

I believe knowing now the effects that these types of weapons can have is one of the reasons we need to get Saddam unarmed. Nobody wants to see such a terrible thing happen again to any country, including the United States!


The fact is that some people just don't have a heart in regards to people of other nations.

I think this is probably the most unthought out statement in this whole thread. I won't even Justify it with an answer.