Wish me luck.....Finally some progress

[pomtzu]

Further - the house is not in both names, just his. I am only tied to the lines of credit (by the bank) used to procure the properties.

Geeze - so if his credit sucks, then so does yours, even tho there is no longer anything legal holding you together? And even if his credit is good, but he is over-extended, then that keeps you from getting credit in your name only? Sorry - I'm not prying - just trying to understand how things work there.

[caseysmom]

You may want to talk to a bureau of credit or something similar they can try something like this but it is possible it is not leagal or appropriate in this situation.

[Queen of Poop]

I have the good credit that's why the bank is holding on to me for dear life. This is also why I have to rent as he has my credit tied up so I cannot buy a home. This is why I'm so frustrated. But if the one property sells he should be able to refinance the other by himself and I will be free.

[Moesha]

But do you think he would he use the money to refinance the other place or would he do something else with it just to keep you in the mess of a situation?

[Queen of Poop]

But do you think he would he use the money to refinance the other place or would he do something else with it just to keep you in the mess of a situation?

I've alerted the bank to the sale listing. That should solve that issue. I hope.

[caseysmom]

Well what I am saying is the banks holding you to the property may not be legitimate, there must be a place that overseas what banks do.

[Cataholic]

This happens in the states, too, when the attorneys don't finish the job. Part of the divorce decree should have read that each party would refinance or sell out right all property that is jointly held or secured by a line of credit, relieving the other party of the obligation. :/