Who will win the election - POLL

[Buddy_Lee]

It's far from absurd to bring up Reagan, particularly in the context mentioned.

Pres. Reagan and Sec.Def wanted a 600 ship Navy.

The US didn't have the yard construction assets to make it reality, however, there were 4 perfectly good Iowa class hulls available sitting in mothballs.

Solution? Upgrade and restore the Iowas to service, giving the US the number of hulls Pres. Reagan wanted in the fleet. The Navy, however, did not want them. They are far too manpower intensive for their taste, but they were forced on the Navy by Congress and others.

You mentioned Battleships.

The only battleships in service since WW2 are the 4 Iowas.

That's their tale, Pres. Reagan was directly involved.


Please, converse as an adult and stop trying to twist statements. If you can't discuss issues in an adult manner without deriding people who disagree with you and can easily back up those disagreements with proof in the form of facts, maybe you shouldn't be in this discussion?

Please show me where I derided you. I merely disagreed. Are you overly sensitive to disagreement?

[Lady's Human]

Your first post in this thread was at once juvenile and derisive. After that, all posts are viewed in that light.


You also automatically assume that anyone who doesn't agree with your jingostic pap is a liberal.

Again, false, and to assume so (as you do repeatedly in your responses) is completely juvenile. I think you're missing the second hour of Savage Nation, so please, don't let us distract you.

[caseysmom]

Please show me where I derided you. I merely disagreed. Are you overly sensitive to disagreement?

Can you read your above sentence? How immature is this?

And no what I got was a president that slowed the recession and stopped an economic collapse, he saved wall street, he saved the auto industry, he ended the war in Iraq, he relaxed anti american sentiment around the world and he is on the verge of passing universal health care.

[Buddy_Lee]

Please show me where I derided you. I merely disagreed. Are you overly sensitive to disagreement?

Your first post in this thread was at once juvenile and derisive. After that, all posts are viewed in that light.


You also automatically assume that anyone who doesn't agree with your jingostic pap is a liberal.

Again, false, and to assume so (as you do repeatedly in your responses) is completely juvenile. I think you're missing the second hour of Savage Nation, so please, don't let us distract you.

I'll have to conclude that you cannot show me where I derided you then.

[Buddy_Lee]

Please show me where I derided you. I merely disagreed. Are you overly sensitive to disagreement?

Can you read your above sentence? How immature is this?

And no what I got was a president that slowed the recession and stopped an economic collapse, he saved wall street, he saved the auto industry, he ended the war in Iraq, he relaxed anti american sentiment around the world and he is on the verge of passing universal health care.

Is it so unfathomable that I may have wanted to apologize if I had indeed derided that poster? I will let you answer your own question as to how immature it is to want to maintain a civil exchange.

[pomtzu]

Hey Buddy_Lee --- did you actually vote in my poll or are you just using this thread to get up on your soapbox and spout off? Perhaps you should change "a little crabby", to "just a big old crab".

[Lady's Human]

I'll have to conclude that you cannot show me where I derided you then.

Your first post was derisive to everyone who disagrees with you. It basically stated that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and can't back up an argument but will instead run away in tears without discussing.


Quit being a condescending, smarmy fool.