Who does he look like? :-)

[moosmom]

It's an observation, that's all. Rumors are just that, RUMORS.

[Lady's Human]

If it's just rumors, can we spread rumors about you?

Somehow I don't think you'd appreciate it.

[pomtzu]

Who gives a rat's a$$ anyway, about who the father is?? These guys had no say in the matter of who their mother made the decision/mistake, of who would be the father. Does it really matter now, anyway - and is it really anybody's business??? No, you say???? - I don't think so either!!!

[wombat2u2004]

That lot are all inbred anyway

[Grace]

That lot are all inbred anyway

I have a cat like that - inbred. He's a SMIB - Southern Michigan In-Bred. His father was also his brother

Poor Grady - he's a love, but a tad bit off at times, if you catch my drift.

[wombat2u2004]

I wonder who the father of this one is.

[wombat2u2004]

I have a cat like that - inbred. He's a SMIB - Southern Michigan In-Bred. His father was also his brother

Poor Grady - he's a love, but a tad bit off at times, if you catch my drift.

His name is Grady ??? How come it's not Billy Bob ??

[Grace]

His name is Grady ??? How come it's not Billy Bob ??

Cuz it's Michigan, wom - not Mississippi

[mrspunkysmom]

That lot are all inbred anyway

I am reminded of the talk by the talking heads of the day (1981?) during Diana's engagement to Charles.

The "talk" had several points (I thought it was disgusting at the time and still do):

Diana was tall, so hopefully the kids would be tall

She was beautiful .....

Although she was more "British" that the current Royals, she was very distantly related and that would introduce some new genes.

I've noticed since Diana and Charles wed, that there has been less fuss about royals marrying commoners. It's about time.

[wombat2u2004]

I am reminded of the talk by the talking heads of the day (1981?) during Diana's engagement to Charles.

The "talk" had several points (I thought it was disgusting at the time and still do):

Diana was tall, so hopefully the kids would be tall

She was beautiful .....

Although she was more "British" that the current Royals, she was very distantly related and that would introduce some new genes.

I've noticed since Diana and Charles wed, that there has been less fuss about royals marrying commoners. It's about time.

I knew a guy once who was a retired gardener, he worked for the Royal Family
on their estates. Some of the stories he told me would make ya stand on ya head.....some real weird stuff goes on with those royals.

[Marigold2]

Years ago the royals all inter-married to control lands and keep power.

Also years ago people did not travel much. Two hundred years ago a person lived and died often without traveling more then 10 miles from their birth place.

Many Amish are interbred they are all called Yoder, Miller, and there is a third name that escapes me now. But there is a small pool of maybe a few hundred in some places here and they interbreed.

Even today most people marry someone within a 30 mile radius.

Jeff Foxworthy told a really funny joke

You might be a redneck if you go to a family reunion to pick up chicks.