I have to wonder if these people who get all bothered about teleprompters have ever given a speech?
Gosh, even Abraham Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg address and had notes when he gave it.
All a teleprompter is - is a modern day version of Lincoln's "notes on the back of an envelope."
I occasionally give public presentations. Frankly, I would be an idiot if I did so without notes. And a telepromter seems like really cool techology instead of looking down at note cards!
But I am confused...Ms. Palin does her reality show from the studio in her living room????
I have, but never on TV. I have given a speech on radio, no notes no teleprompter. I had a basic outline but thats it. Before you ask it was for a jive morning radio program trying to win a prize. I have acted on stage as well.
From what I remember of my public speaking course in HS, giving a speech from notes, even on ones palm, would be far more difficult then reading from a teleprompter. Notes, written on cards or ones palm, or "talking points" are far harder to make a speech with then a teleprompter.
If you are a bad public speaker, use a teleprompter. If I ever had to again and had a choice I would use notes, to give me the room to improvise.
Im leaving this one alone, too easy.But I am confused...
Last edited by blue; 02-15-2011 at 03:36 AM.
And I thought the content of the speech more important than whether you can memorize it!
Putting your skills aside - did you know Reagan was a masterful user of the teleprompter?
George W. Bush preferred large print note cards...
(guess those guys were as good at memorization)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...59-503544.html
But what I don't get is why does anyone care which tool a person uses - notes or teleprompter? That is like caring whether a person uses a cell phone or a landline...a convection oven or a regular oven...a digital clock or an analog clock. It is just a matter of which tool a person prefers. Wierd.
Nah! Not WEIRD! Just fussy! Some people like the real thing the up front truth from the heart type of thing. There is that monotone voice when a teleprompter is used. Look at Adolph ( bad example I know) but he almost conquered the world with his enthusiastic speeches.
I always felt Reagan was speaking from his heart - and never knew until now that he used a teleprompter. Did I miss the monotone
I agree with ES - doesn't matter one whit what means one needs/uses to get the point across - as long as they can communicate.
A few points...
- I feel confident Adolph did not use a teleprompter! Nor did he almost conquer the world...Europe is not the world.
- When the President is giving the State of the Union Address - I'm not looking for what is in his heart.
- There can be just as much "heart" in a speech that has been written in advance as in a spontaneous speech. There is much "heart" in the Gettysburg address - even though Lincoln wrote it in advance and read it from his notes. There was "heart" in Reagan's speech about "tear down this wall!" which was written and re-written a number of times before he gave it.
- And...I don't want a President who has time to memorize a speech. There are far, far better uses of time.
I am just fussy that way.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks