redog::::Let me join with some of the others here. How about you telling us what you think Vick can teach us about eradicating animal abuse? I am really interested in hearing your answers.
First, you ask a question, and, suddenly, those that answer with an answer you don't like is on trial?? We choose not to associate with Vick so we are useless in the fight to stop animal abuse?? Really?? How so?
Suppose we find Vick a disgusting human being and prefer not to be in his presence? Suppose we think we're not the proper person to confront Vick personally? Does this make us a lesser person in this fight? I don't believe Michael Vick is the answer to end animal abuse. I see other ways to fight it. Because I choose to never get close enough to this scumbag to ask a question, that certainly doesn't make me lax in wanting animal abuse abolished. It's a whole lot bigger than Michael Vick.
You're rather bold on this board for a person that has 34 posts aren't you? You asked for people's answers and that's what you're getting. Are you in charge of a rule book that governs what people can and can not say in answering a posted question? There is no need in getting nasty to anyone that candidly answers your question.
NEWS FLASH: Who can put aside anger and disgust when it comes to Michael Vick? Not me. He is the epitome of anger and disgust in my book.








Bookmarks