What is this?

[Alysser]

I e-mailed them, I will be eager to hear what they have to say for themselves - this is what I sent them:

Hi, I have a few questions about your website. In your guarantee, it states that you are a "network" of breeders. Meanwhile, as I browsed the website there was absolutely no breeder names, websites, etc. I am a big advocate for dog adoption and very against any kind of puppymill or and organization of that sort. It just seems odd to me that you expect people to drop thousands of dollars when you do not provide any credible information on the breeder, parents or any of that. I realize some dogs have SOME sparse info about who bred them, but I don't really understand it how a "network" of breeders provides no information on the breeders.



- A Concerned pet lover



I dunno, I hope they prove me wrong which is most likely not going to be the case. I guess I just want some closure that it is not a puppymill type organization. We don't need anymore of those in the world. I feel my e-mail is polite, so hopefully they answer in the same manner. -_- I wasn't going to e-mail them but someone voice needs to be heard, I know I can't change the world with this e-mail but if it changes something or I get the answers I am craving from it, I will be happier about this website. It's just really fishy though.

[*LabLoverKEB*]

Sounds good, Alyssa!
I've emailed a few APBT breeders who advertised in DogFancy magazine who I've suspected were not good breeders, and oh my, you should see the responses I get!
"Yeah okay- you don't know $*&# about pits. I've got the best *&^$*($ bloodlines out there." Yeah I know nada about dogs, or breeding for that matter. I don't care about bloodlines- good bloodlines do not make a good dog in some cases!
OH THE NERVE!

Seriously though, we need to find out how to set up a law for someone to look at- and try, try, try to get it passed!

[Alysser]

Sounds good, Alyssa!
I've emailed a few APBT breeders who advertised in DogFancy magazine who I've suspected were not good breeders, and oh my, you should see the responses I get!
"Yeah okay- you don't know $*&# about pits. I've got the best *&^$*($ bloodlines out there." Yeah I know nada about dogs, or breeding for that matter. I don't care about bloodlines- good bloodlines do not make a good dog in some cases!
OH THE NERVE!

Seriously though, we need to find out how to set up a law for someone to look at- and try, try, try to get it passed!

Some people suck, I am sorry you had that experience. Mikey's breeder seems like a good enough breeder for pugs and beagles (her two "specialty" breeders) but honestly just the fact that she breeds mutts pisses me off. It's sad that people who buy puppies from these places now-a-days don't do research on their breeders Breeders use the words "Champion Bloodlines" too freely. Champion bloodlines for some breeders could mean literally over 20 years or the dogs great, great, great, great, great grandparents. People also enjoy the words "registered with the AKC" and "Purebred. It sucks, it really does. I looked up Sassy's breeders once, her grandmother had won maybe two "Best In Shows", "Best of Breed", and I believe even some agility titles. Her mother had won a few "best of breeds" if I remember correctly.