If a male can be required to have insurance for in vitro fertilization, is it really hard to believe he wouldnt get paternity leave under .gov health care?
Really, why?
Edit: LH, from what Ive read in Mass they do get IVF coverage.
Again, group plans are written to cover multiple contingencies.
They are not written for individuals, and thank god insurance plans aren't written for individuals. No one would be able to afford insurance coverage.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
That has nothing to do with .gov. It's how insurance is written, period.
Roll your eyes all you want, reality is reality.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
Men aren't given insurance for IVF.
The Group Policy that the man is a part of may or may not cover IVF. For instance, the BC/BS plan for FEHB includes reproductive services in general, which, being that I'm part of the group, could be construed as my insurance plan covering IVF for men.
All depends on how you parse the words, or, in a more famous statement, it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is.
Paternity leave is granted under FMLA, regardless of health insurance status, and as ES has stated, there is no requirement that it be paid leave.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks