Why would I bother?
Go ahead and further derail it.
BTW: Was it Marx or Stalin who kept repeating "The Greater Good, For The Greater Good, The Greater Good, For The Greater Good"?
And your original topic was accusing the President of Indoctrinating children ... and again, I asked where you would draw the line between teaching and indoctrination.
And don't you go quoting some dictionary definition at me - anyone can find a definition on the Internet - that's not what I am interesting in. For example, I didn't ask you for a textbook definition of Socialism, but your definition.
Yes, there are always children who end up illiterate, but look at the percentages of literacy in countries with public education systems, versus those without one.
I've Been Frosted
Where did I accuse the president of anything? I asked a question.
Sorry to pull a lefty tactic but you left it open.
My definition of socialism?
Instead of teaching a man to fish, you take, by force, fish from the fisherman and give it to those who dont know how to fish.
Socialism is a forced, false, system of equality.
ETA: How in the heck did socialism become part of this discussion? It wasnt even part of my OP!
Further ETA: I brought socialism into this dang it.
My thread lady, not yours. It doesnt change the fact that the public school system is a socialist system.
"Is the President attempting to indoctrinate children?"
is your title of this thread, so while technically you are asking a question, you are implying an accusation.
And so how are public schools socialism? Ain't no American school that turns out all "equal" students, but they do attempt at least to provide students with a a basic education, to do with what they will.
And your definition of socialism sounds more like communism to me.
I've Been Frosted
Asking questions is now accusatory? I did not attach my own bias to the question, nor did I imply my bias to the question.
Not socialism, its a socialist system. Take from everybody to benifit a few.And so how are public schools socialism? Ain't no American school that turns out all "equal" students, but they do attempt at least to provide students with a a basic education, to do with what they will.
The end result is the same, so why split hairs?And your definition of socialism sounds more like communism to me.
Not asking a question, the word choice holds its own bias.
Do not these three questions sound different?
"Is the President trying to indoctrinate children?"
"Is the President trying to teach children?"
"Is the President trying to speak to children?"
How does public education "benefit a few?"
Wars have been fought over socialism versus communism. I hardly call that splitting hairs.
I've Been Frosted
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks