Please state your objections to her qualifications or when she has not followed the Constitution.
If you do not wish to engage in conversation about her qualifications please do not post.
She has handed down decisions that have gone on both sides of the so-called "political divide."
Please explain when she has decided based on anything BUT the Constitution!
No, you show us where she is a Constitutionalist. According to you, understanding REAL people is qualification enough to be a SC Justice :ETA: and it is, a SC Justice dosent even have to be a judge TMK:. So make your case as to why she is such a great choice.
Last edited by blue; 05-27-2009 at 11:45 PM.
Reason: puctuation. I think.
Bookmarks