Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
Theres a problem here.

Liz's link is from 01/14/09.

The MSNBC link is from 03/10/09 and the related Judicial Watch story is from 03/13/09.

Its possible that Factcheck.org hasnt seen the documents cited by Judicial Watch. ETA: Keep in mind the JW story is part of a weekly update ending on a friday.
Judicial Watch got it's bloomers in a knot when it finally thought they
had "the goods" on the Speaker, Palosi.

Sorry , but they were wrong in their conclusions.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/200...dog-group.html